Sensor top

Open Vibration Node

An open hardware and open firmware vibration sensing node for industrial condition monitoring — analysing vibration on the device and reporting results over LoRaWAN to a gateway you run yourself, with no mandatory cloud service.

Status: sensor board verified, radio path not yet exercised. The second-generation sensor board has been manufactured and verified on the bench — the sensor identifies correctly, gravity and impact-response tests pass, and the noise floor sits at ~18 mg RMS across the full 6.3 kHz bandwidth on a bench (measurements). The RAK3112 module has so far served only as the host MCU for those tests; the SX1262 radio has not yet been brought up. Mechanical integration and the signal-processing firmware are the current work.

The two 28 mm boards that make up a node — sensor board and radio board, both sides. More photographs: docs/images.

Why this project exists

Predictive maintenance works: measuring vibration on motors, bearings, pumps and fans reveals developing faults weeks or months before they cause a breakdown. The techniques are well documented in engineering literature, and the sensors cost a few euros.

Access to them is not open, though. Commercial condition-monitoring systems are closed end to end — proprietary sensors, proprietary gateways, and a vendor cloud that must stay reachable and paid for, or the equipment stops being monitored. Prices start in the hundreds of euros per measurement point, which puts continuous monitoring out of reach for small manufacturers, municipal utilities, water pumping stations and building services — exactly the operators who can least afford an unplanned failure.

Open vibration-monitoring projects do exist. The ones I have found stop at a development board on a desk, depend on a vendor cloud, or use accelerometers limited to a few hundred hertz — which rules out the 1–6 kHz region where bearing faults first appear. What is missing is a node that combines the bandwidth needed for real diagnostics with local-first operation and documentation good enough to rebuild it. This project aims to be that node.

How this compares with existing work

Open lab-instrument projects — open microscopes, open test equipment — have already shown that laboratory-grade but open and rebuildable is a workable model. This project applies that model to industrial vibration monitoring.

Design goals

These are the goals the design is being built towards, not a description of what already works — see the status above.

• Analysis on the device. FFT and envelope processing run on the node's MCU. Only results leave the device — a compact payload of dominant frequencies, amplitudes, RMS and temperature (target: under 24 bytes), not raw waveforms. This is what makes battery-powered operation over a low-bandwidth radio possible at all.
• Local-first. LoRaWAN with a self-hosted ChirpStack network server: the reference gateway is a Raspberry Pi 5 with an SX1302 eight-channel concentrator, and everything from radio to database runs on hardware the operator owns. No account, no vendor cloud, no remote kill switch. Cloud services are optional, never required.
• Auditable and reproducible. Schematics, bill of materials, firmware source and enclosure models under free licences, with build documentation detailed enough to reproduce a working node.
• Long field life. Multi-year operation on a primary lithium cell. Sealed enclosure for industrial and outdoor use.
• Secure by design. Per-device keys, signed firmware updates and a published software bill of materials, so that nodes remain maintainable under the EU Cyber Resilience Act rather than becoming unsupported hardware.

Hardware

Why these parts

IIS3DWB. Bearing and mechanical fault signatures live in the 1–6 kHz region, while ordinary MEMS accelerometers (ADXL345, LIS3DH and similar) are limited to 200–800 Hz — they physically cannot see what matters. The IIS3DWB gives a flat 6.3 kHz bandwidth at 75 µg/√Hz noise in a single 2.5 × 3.0 mm package, so diagnostics that previously required a piezoelectric accelerometer with an external conditioner now fit in a 28 mm node running from a battery.

RAK3112. The ESP32-S3 has enough compute to run the FFT locally, which is the whole premise of the design: the node transmits a spectral summary rather than raw waveforms, which is what makes both the battery budget and the LoRa duty cycle work. Combining it with the SX1262 in one certified module means a single component instead of MCU plus radio plus RF matching, and no antenna network to design. The trade-off is board area in exchange for reproducibility and a simpler certification path — a deliberate choice for a project that others are meant to be able to rebuild.

Everything that goes into one node: the two boards, primary cell, energy buffer, antennas, printed housing and the aluminium mounting pad.

Board architecture

Two 28 mm round boards with the battery between them, joined by seven wires:

• Sensor board — IIS3DWB on the bottom layer, facing the measured surface, with decoupling capacitors and a CS pull-up.
• Radio board — RAK3112 on the top layer (antenna facing away from metal), LDO and power components underneath.

Inter-board signals: GND, 3V3, SPI_CS, SPI_SCK, SPI_MISO, SPI_MOSI, INT1. Pad order is identical on both boards, so the wires run straight across without crossing.

Placing the accelerometer on the bottom layer is deliberate — it shortens the mechanical path between the measured surface and the sensing element, which matters far more for signal fidelity than any amount of filtering afterwards.

Two data paths

A node normally sends only a spectral summary — a payload of a couple of dozen bytes, which is what makes years of battery life on a low-bandwidth radio possible at all. That summary is enough to trend a machine's condition, but not to investigate a fault in detail.

So the node keeps a second path. The RAK3112 carries 8 MB of PSRAM, enough to hold about 50 seconds of the full 26.667 kHz three-axis stream. When something in the trend needs looking at, an engineer standing next to the machine can trigger a capture and pull the raw recording off over WiFi, straight to a laptop — no cloud and no gateway involved. This path works on the bench as of September 2026: a downlink command makes the node record 32768 samples per axis (1.23 s — the PSRAM allows about 50 s; 1.23 s is the current capture length) from the sensor FIFO into PSRAM and post them over WiFi to the collector (the local server described above; a laptop also works), which it locates by mDNS.

This is deliberately on demand rather than continuous: streaming raw data would end the battery budget within days. Routine monitoring stays cheap; full detail is available when it is actually needed.

Repository layout

Licences

• Firmware and software: MIT
• Hardware design files: CERN-OHL-W-2.0 (see hardware/LICENSE.txt)
• Documentation: CC-BY-SA-4.0

Roadmap

Timing is indicative and assumes part-time development; with project funding it compresses.

1. Sensor board validated on hardware — done, August 2026 (measurements)
2. Radio bring-up: SX1262 transmit and receive path — done, September 2026: point-to-point LoRa link (869.525 MHz, SF7) in both directions, downlink-configurable cadence within the duty-cycle budget, on-demand raw capture over WiFi; velocity RMS in the ISO 10816 band validated (measurements). The interim link terminates in a USB LoRa receiver on the collector (the local server described under Local-first); roadmap item 4 replaces it with the SX1302 LoRaWAN gateway and ChirpStack.
3. Mechanical integration: sensor coupling, sealing, field-ready housing (pad and housing models published; sealing details in progress) — winter 2026/27
4. On-device FFT and envelope processing, LoRaWAN uplink with a versioned payload format (draft specification) — spring 2027. Interim: FFT, envelope and waterfall spectra are computed on the collector from FIFO captures; each packet already carries band-limited velocity RMS, crest factor and a sensor-health flag (status).
5. Characterisation against a reference accelerometer on a shaker — spring/summer 2027
6. Field deployment on real rotating equipment, with published measurement data — second half of 2027
7. Documented reproducible build — someone else assembles a node from this repository — late 2027

About

Built by Laurynas Misiūnas, an electronics engineer in Klaipėda district, Lithuania, with six years of industrial experience deploying edge AI vision systems and embedded controllers on production lines. Developed with the support of the Klaipėda Science and Technology Park (KMTP) innovation support programme.

Contributions, review and questions are welcome — see CONTRIBUTING.md or open an issue.

Transparency: use of generative AI

Engineering decisions, architecture and project direction in this repository are made by the author. Documentation and English-language texts are drafted with the assistance of a large language model (Anthropic Claude) and reviewed, corrected and approved by the author before publication. Commits with LLM-assisted content carry a Co-Authored-By: Claude trailer. Details in TRANSPARENCY.md.

No firmware, hardware design files or measurement data will be presented as project deliverables without human authorship and verification.